گزارش سمینار بررسی روش های اندازه گیری قابلیت استفاده مجدد در خط تولید نرم افزار

فهرست و منابع گزارش سمینار بررسی روش های اندازه گیری قابلیت استفاده مجدد در خط تولید نرم افزار

فهرست:

چکیده .................................................................................................................... ٩

١-١. مقدمه ............................................................................................................ ١١

١-٢. طرح مساله ...................................................................................................... ١١

١-٣. تعیین محدوده تحقیق ........................................................................................ ١٢

١-٤. ساختار گزارش ................................................................................................. ١٢

٢-١. مقدمه ............................................................................................................ ١٥

٢-٢. تاریخچه خط تولید ............................................................................................ ١٥

٢-٣. خط تولید نرم افزار ............................................................................................ ١٧

٢-٣-١. تعریف ..................................................................................................... ١٧

٢-٤. دلیل استفاده از خط تولید نرم افزار ...................................................................... ٢٠

٢-٥. نمونه هایی از کاربرد خط تولید ........................................................................... ٢٠

٢-٦. خلاصه ........................................................................................................... ٢٢

٣-١. مقدمه ............................................................................................................ ٢٤

٣-٢. مفاهیم اولیه .................................................................................................... ٢٤

٣-٣. مدل خصوصیات ................................................................................................ ٢٦

٣-٤. مراحل ایجاد مدل خصوصیات ................................................................................ ٣٠

٣-٥. اعتبارسنجی مدل .............................................................................................. ٣٠

٣-٧. کاربرد مدل خصوصیات ....................................................................................... ٣١

٣-٨. روش های تعریف و مدلسازی مدل خصوصیات ............................................................. ٣١

٣-٨-١. روش FODA ............................................................................................ ٣٢

 34 ................................................................................................... FORM.2-8-3

 36 ............................................................................................  FeatuRSEB.3-8-3

 37 ...................................................................................................   GPFT.5-8-3

 38 .....................................................................................................   EFD.6-8-3

 4

 39 .........................................................................................  PLUSS (PFT).7-8-3

٣-٩. مدل کردن مدل خصوصیات همراه با نیازهای غیر وظیفه مندی ........................................ ٤٠

٣-٩-١. چارچوب NFR    ....................................................................................... ٤٠

٣-١٠. تحلیل مدل خصوصیات ..................................................................................... ٤٢

٣-١٠-١. فرمال ................................................................................................... ٤٣

٣-١٠-١-٤. مزایا .................................................................................................. ٤٨

٣-١٠-٢. استدلال خودکار روی درخت خصوصیات .......................................................... ٤٨

٣-١٠-٢-٢.مسئله ارضای محدودیت ........................................................................... ٥٠

٣-١٠-٢-٣. تعاریف مسئله ارضای محدودیت ................................................................. ٥٠

٣-١٠-٢-٤. نگاشت درخت خصوصیات و مسئله ارضای محدودیت ....................................... ٥٢

٣-١٠-٢-٥. استدلال خودکار مدل خصوصیات ............................................................... ٥٣

٣-١٠-٣. نتیجه گیری ............................................................................................. ٥٦

٤-١. خصوصیات کیفی .................................................................................................. ٥٩

٤-٢. مدل های کیفی ................................................................................................. ٦١

٤-٣. اهمیت خصوصیات کیفی در خط تولید  نرم افزار .......................................................... ٦٤

٤-٤. کیفیت نرم افزار در خط تولید نرم افزار....................................................................... ٦٦

٤-٥. مدل های کیفی برای خط تولید نرم افزار .................................................................... ٦٨

٤-٥-١. مقدمه ..................................................................................................... ٦٨

٤-٥-٢. خصوصیات مدل های کیفی خط تولید نرم افزار ..................................................... ٦٩

٤-٦. بررسی مدل های کیفی موجود ............................................................................ ٦٩

٥-١. مقدمه ............................................................................................................... ٨٤

٥-٢. قابلیت استفاده مجدد ......................................................................................... ٨٤

٥-٣. تاریخچه قابلیت استفاده مجدد ........................................................................... ٨٦

٥-٤. مشکلات موجود در قابلیت استفاده مجدد .............................................................. ٨٩

٥-٥. قابلیت استفاده مجدد در خط تولید نرم افزار............................................................ ٩٠

 5

٥-٩. نتیجه گیری ................................................................................................... ١١١

٦-١. مقدمه .......................................................................................................... ١١٣

٦-٢. شناسایی نقایص کارهای انجام شده ....................................................................... ١١٤

٦-٢-١. موارد قابل بحث در ارائه روش ارزیابی (اندازه گیری ) خصوصیات کیفی نرم افزار در خط تولید

نرم افزار ................................................................................................................ ١١٤

٦-٣. موضوع جدید برای تحقیق .................................................................................. ١١٥

٦-٤. سوالات تحقیق ............................................................................................... ١١٦

٦-٥. مسیر تحقیق .................................................................................................. ١١٦

٦-٦. شکل خروجی مورد انتظار .................................................................................. ١١٧

٦-٧. شیوه ارزیابی نتایج تحقیق .................................................................................. ١١٧

منبع:

[1] D. Benavides, P. Trinidad, and A. Ruiz-cort‟es, “Automated reasoning on feature models”,

In 17th international conference on advanced information systems engineering, Vol. 35, No. 6,

pp. 615-636, 2005.

[2] L. Chung, B. A.Nixon, “Dealing with non-functional requirements: three experimental

studies of a process-oriented approach”, In proceeding of the 17th international conference on

software engineering, 1995.

[3] P. Borba, R. Gheyi, and T. Massoni, “Algebraic laws for feature models”, In  journal of

universal computer science, Vol. 14, No. 21, pp. 3573-3591, 2008.

[4] D. Batory, D. Benavides, and A. Ruiz-cortes,” Automated analyses of feature models:

challenges ahead”, In communication of the ACM magazine, Vol. 49, No. 12, 2006.

[5] M. Riebisch, K. Bollert, D. Streitferdt, and I. Philippow, “Extending feature diagrams with

UML multiplicities”, In integrated design and process technology journal, 2002.

[6] K. C.Kang, S. G.Cohen, J. A.Hess, W. E.Novak and A.S. Peterson, “Feature-Oriented

Domain Analysis (FODA) feasibility study”, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon

University, Pennsylvania, Tech. Rep. TR-21, 1990.

[7] K. C. Kang, J. Lee, and P. Donohoe, “Feature-oriented product line engineering”, In ieee

software journal, Vol 19, No. 4, pp. 58-65, 2002.

[8]  K. C. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, K. Kim, G. J. Kim, and E. Shin,“FORM: A Feature-Oriented

Reuse Method with domain-specific reference architectures”, In annals of software engineering

journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 143-168, 2001.

 [9] J. Sun, H. Zhang, Y. F. Li, and H. Wang, “Formal semantics and verification for feature

modeling”, In proceedings of the 10th ieee international conference on engineering of complex

computer systems, 2005.

[10] P. Schobbens , P. Heymans, J. Trigaux , and Y. Bontemps, “Generic semantics of feature

diagrams “,In international journal of computer and telecommunication networking, Vol. 51,

No. 2, 2007.

[11] H. Washizaki, H. Yamamoto, and Y. Fukazawa, “A metrics suite for measuring reusability

of software components”, In proceedings of the s9th international software metrics symposium,

2003.

[12] R. S. Pressman, Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach, 5th edition, 2000, Ch.

19.

th

[13] A. Trendowicz, and T. Punter, “Quality modeling for software product lines”, In 7

ECOOP workshop on quantitative approaches in object-oriented software engineering, 2003.

 119

[14] V. R.Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. D.Rombach, Encyclopedia of software engineering, wiley

1994.

[15] B. Gonzalez-Baixauli, J. Mylopoulos, and J. Cesar, “Visual variability analysis for goal

models” , In proceeding of 12th ieee international requirement engineering conference,2004.

[16] J. S. Her, J. H. Kim, S. H. Oh, S. Y.Rhew, and S. D.Kim, “A framework for evaluating

reusability of core asset in product line engineering ”, In information and software engineering

journal, Vol. 49, No. 7, july 2007.

[17] D. Zubrow, and G. Chastek, “Measures for software product lines”, Software Engineering

Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania, Tech. Rep. TR-21, 2003.

[18] L. Etxeberria, G. Sagardui, and L. Belategi, “Quality aware software product line

engineering”, In journal of the Brazilian computer society, Vol. 14, No.1, 2008.

[19] L. Brownsword, and P. Clements, “A case study in successful product line development”,

Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania, Tech. Rep. TR-016,

1996.

rd

[20]  C. W. Krueger, “Software product line reuse in practice”, In proceeding of ieee 3

symposium on application-specific systems and software engineering technology, pp. 117-118,

2000.

[21] W. Frakes, and C. Terry, “Software reuse: metrics and models”, In journal of acm

computer surveys, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1996.

[22] S. G. Shiva, and L. A. Shala, “Software reuse: research and practice”, In proceeding of

ieee international conference on information technology, 2007.

[23]  W. B. Frakes, and K. Kang, “Software reuse research: status and future”, In journal of

ieee transactions on software engineering, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 529-536, July. 2005.

[24] M. Krsek, J. V. Zyl, R. Redpath, and B. Clohesy,”Experiences of large banks: hurdles and

enablers to the adoption of software product line practices in large corporate organizations”, In

12th international software product line conference, 2008.

[25]  J. D. McGregor, D. Muthig, K. Yoshimura, and P. Jensen,“ Successful software product

line practices”, In ieee software journal, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 16-21, 2010.

[26] F. Van der linden, K. Schmid, and E. Rommes, Software product lines in action, Berlin

Heidelberg: Springer, 2007.

[27] K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F. Van der linden, Software product line engineering:

foundations, principles, and techniques, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2005.

[28] G. Gordon Schulmeyer, Handbook of software quality assurance, 4th edition, Artech

house, 2008.

 120

[29] P. Clements, S. Cohen, P. Donohoe, and L. Northrop,” Control channel toolkit: a software

product line case study”,  Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University,

Pennsylvania, Tech. Rep. TR-030, 2001.

[30] D. Benavides, A. Ruiz–cort´es, P. Trinidad, and S. Segura, “A survey on the automated

analysis of feature models”, In proceeding of JISBD conference, pp. 367-376, 2006.

[31] D. Batory,” Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas”, In lecture notes in

computer science journal, Vol. 3714, pp. 7-20, 2005.

[32] D. Benavides, S. Segura, and A. Ruiz-cortés, “Automated analysis of feature models 20

years later: a literature review”, In information systems journal, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 615-636,

2010.

[33] D. R. Mcandrews, “Establishing a software measurement process”, Software Engineering

Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania, Tech. Rep. TR-16, 1993.

th

[34] M. Janota and J. Kiniry, “Reasoning about feature models in higher-order logic”, In 11

international software product line conference, 2007.

[35] F. Ahmed, A. Beg, S. Alkobaisi, and L. F. Capretz, “Framework for visual modeling of

software product line”, In  ieee software journal, pp. 484-488, 2010.

[36] D. Zubrow, and G. Chastek, “Measures for software product lines”, Software Engineering

Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania, Tech. Rep. TR-031, 2003.

[37] M. Neil, and N. Fenton,” Predicting software quality using bayesian belief networks”, In

proceedings of 21st  annual software engineering workshop NASA.Goddard space flight centre,

1996.

[38] R. Muschevici, D. Clarke, and J. Proenca, “Feature petri nets”, In proceeding of software

product line engineering conference, Vol. 2, pp. 99-106, 2010.

[39] S. Bailin, “Features need stories”, In international conference on software reuse, pp. 51-

64, 2009.

[40] R. Gheyi, T. Massoni, and P. Borba, “Algebraic laws for feature models”, In universal

computer science journal, Vol. 14, No. 21, pp. 3573-3591, 2008.

th

[41] Y. Ishida, “Software product lines approach in enterprise system development”, In 11

international software product line conference, 2007.

[42] R. Ommering,“Software reuse in product populations”, In ieee transactions on software

engineering, Vol. 31, No. 7, 2005.

[43] Ruben Prieto-Diaz, “Domain analysis: an introduction”, In acm SIGSOFT Software

Engineering Notes 15(2), pp. 47-54, April, 1990.

 121

[44] N.E. Fenton, S.L.O. Pfleeger, Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach,

International Thomson Computer Press, 1996.

[45] Y. Choi, S. Lee, H. Song, J. Park, S. Kim, “Practical s.w component quality evaluation

model”, In 10th  International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, pp. 259-

264 ,2008.

[46] P. Clements, and L. Northrop, Software product line practices and patterns, Addison

Wesley, 2001.

[47] L. Northrop, “Software product line essentials”, presented at software engineering

institute, carnegie mellon university, 2008.